![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjjvIVUM5U8P0fgE54UgisAMHIFu3bK37h3DX0D3BB0DVYaBeCQdSiFUscDOyOLPQp70G02XkoYwksCQcp7sCGspp-WNJUGD8G5884HvT1eut2xKGteC16zlNtsrM2Qi-zK4VeRzD-QpamY/s320/double2.jpg)
Both retro style sets, AND from the same year (2006). No Topps, I did not notice. You have won again.
The next two however, I found a bit more weird.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEghfxZ226g2owdErXtxDWHsfE2iMUC2cPIph3730nfc_11AJLbpD2caLH_Pk0OAWBWZA5DjtQpP7-y1z8-isq3zlw3OI_hsz4dvZY9zoQXzIlv7giUETe39OZakh90FhQHo6_mxHx0MfpGT/s320/double.jpg)
Both 2010 issues, but obviously one is Topps and the other Upper Deck. A slight difference in the shot, with the UD more than likely being taken first. Topps looks a little washed out in comparison, where as the UD is probably closer to how "real life" looked when it was taken. No complaints really, a good shot on both cards. Thats something I could never fault Upper Deck for is their photography. Always quality shots in every set and usually a hefty number of them to boot. I picked up more 2010 UD a few days ago, and I'm this close [____] to wanting to put that final UD issue together. Maybe sometime soon.
No comments:
Post a Comment