data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80bdd/80bdd59b935deca55aa8c3b912d5fc9db9a9a4da" alt=""
Both retro style sets, AND from the same year (2006). No Topps, I did not notice. You have won again.
The next two however, I found a bit more weird.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a247a/a247af5988c7c25055c6237619723f6250ca09b4" alt=""
Both 2010 issues, but obviously one is Topps and the other Upper Deck. A slight difference in the shot, with the UD more than likely being taken first. Topps looks a little washed out in comparison, where as the UD is probably closer to how "real life" looked when it was taken. No complaints really, a good shot on both cards. Thats something I could never fault Upper Deck for is their photography. Always quality shots in every set and usually a hefty number of them to boot. I picked up more 2010 UD a few days ago, and I'm this close [____] to wanting to put that final UD issue together. Maybe sometime soon.
No comments:
Post a Comment